You may have many reasons not to read Gone With The Wind: (1) it’s too long (2) it is more history than plot (3) it’s racist (4) I already saw the movie. Let’s discuss.
(1) Wouldn’t you rather have 1000 (almost 1100!) pages of fun than just 250 pages of fun?
(2) There is a lot of history in this book! I’m no historian but if someone qualified could check that the facts are correct, it would be a great idea to assign it to American History classes. Much more enjoyable than a dry textbook, and a masterful demonstration of the impact of wars on the civilian population, not to mention the after-war, aka Reconstruction period. And of course lessons can be drawn for more modern conflicts, especially the need to allow the losing side to keep some dignity.
(3) Even the saintly Melanie Wilkes never thinks for one moment that slavery may be a problematic institution, and the way African-Americans are addressed, treated, and talked about is often appalling. The book is plenty sexist as well, with what we would now call spouse abuse pretty much tolerated and viewed as normal. Perhaps we can view both racism and sexism as expressions of a time and place rather than a prescription for us today.
(4) Gone With The Wind was the first movie I saw unchaperoned, with my favorite cousin, so I remember it very well, including our great surprise to discover that movies could have intermissions. But the book! It pulled me along, page after page, even though I knew very well Scarlett’s fate (or I thought I knew: I did not remember what happened after that intermission very well at all). It pulled me into another world in which I heard the canons of the Union, I saw the gaudiness of Scarlett’s Atlanta mansion, and I felt the contempt of the old guard for her. It’s much more than a few movies lines. It is an intricate story with characters that are not just complex, but also evolve over time. And it’s an excellent portrait of women and how they adapt to circumscribed roles.
In brief: pick it up and start reading. (Thank you Lyn for suggesting this book to me.)
So I said I would read the original Emma, and I did. I even managed to read a big part of it while flying to the UK, to put me in the mood, as it were. And I’m happy to report that the original is wonderful. It’s not entirely clear to me why we 21st-century denizens can find the lives of idle upperclass 19th-century folks so fascinating, but we do get caught up in the grave decision of who should open the ball, not to mention who should marry whom…
Emma, the main character, is a spirited and occasionally misguided young woman — but after all, she is only 20! But she may not be the most interesting character. Her father, a timid, worried misanthrope, frets during the entire story. Miss Bates is an accomplished (and mocked) motormouth, and we get to eavesdrop on her perfectly rendered prattle. And Mrs Elton, a self-centered snob, provides a counterpoint of unending jabbering, but with a queen-bee venom. Delicious, despite the various racist commentaries and the obviously dated views of young women’s opportunities. Today, Emma would be embarking on a powerful career instead of being chided by Mr. Knightley in prelude to marrying him. I just gave away the end but you knew it already, right?
The massive and classic David Copperfield clearly shows its roots as a serial: it feels like a soap opera, albeit one with proper grammar. An abused child, an unerringly honest man despite being surrounded by shady characters, a perfect husband to a pretty silly first wife (why did he ever choose her?), David Copperfield the man gets to be a little irritating with his saintness. As for David Copperfield the book, choose it only if you can swallow 1000+ pages, perhaps on a very slow, slightly boring vacation?
As announced a couple weeks ago, Armadale is the Wilkie Collins novel I liked least — but that does not mean I did not read it avidly. At over 700 pages, it features (take a deep breath): an illicit romance, a stolen child, two men with the same name, a couple of stolen fortunes, two shipwrecks, a corrupt doctor, and, best of all, a wicked heroine who seeks to ruin an entire family.
I’m not giving anything away as every plot twist is heavily announced and foreshadowed in solid 19th century style, all based on a shared dream, no less. That was too much for me!
That said, the heroine is stupendous. In modern times she would be a scheming CEO (spying on the competition rather than the simpleton Armadale), snorting cocaine (she has to make do with laudanum in this story) and enjoying her male conquests (she needs to pretend to be perfectly chaste here, so she stops at bigamy). I’m always amazed of how modern Collins’s themes can be.
Filed under Classic, Mystery
In After the Funeral, Hercule Poirot is called to investigate an accusation of murder that’s made at the funeral reception by the eccentric much younger sister of the deceased, a sister who is promptly murdered herself, a prelude to more disorders. In a classic move, he invites all family members back to the palatial family home for a weekend of scrutiny during which we see all the little and large secrets exposed to reveal the vile, unexpected killer. Must drink good tea throughout the reading and not expect to get a good night sleep if interrupted after the gruesome second murder.
Filed under Classic, Mystery